Brief
Create a set of between six and ten finished images on the theme of the decisive moment. You may choose to create imagery that supports the tradition of the ‘decisive moment’ or you may choose to question or invert the concept by presenting a series of ‘indecisive’ moments. Your aim isn’t to tell a story, but in order to work naturally as a series there should be a linking theme, whether it’s a location, event or particular period of time.
Include a written introduction to your work of between 500 and 1000 words outlining your initial ideas and subsequent development. You’ll need to contextualise your response with photographers that you’ve looked at, and don’t forget to reference the reading that you’ve done.
Introduction
During this assignment I had two themes which I worked with in parallel only deciding very late which I wanted to go forward with and present here.
The theme which I have not brought forward asks the question, what would the decisive moment be if those moments are 1/2s long? This theme is connected to a deep interest I have in physics and the concept of time and now. How this time is connected with matter and energy revealing reality to us at the speed of light. All visual arts and especially photography has these concepts as bedrock. I was very lucky to come across a phenomenon when shooting seagulls at 400ms, these cease to look like seagull’s or even material and start to resemble energy waves. I created a number of abstract images which appear on the contact sheet for the assignment. I investigated Wolgang Tillman’s abstract work and found some similarities and inspiration. Ultimately I could not find a strong enough link to the brief for this assignment. I may however bring this idea back later in Expressing Your Vision as I find the concept and output fascinating.
Inspiration for the theme of this series comes directly from The Present, the photobook by Paul Graham and from the review of this work by Colin Pantall. The images I created are both a challenge to and in some ways an endorsement of what I think about The Present. For technique and understanding of street photography and not being particularly experienced in this area I read – Larry Fink On composition and improvisation and used this for much of the technical decisions I made.
Pantall writes about The Present “It looks pretty much like any other run down place. The people are the same. They’re not glamorous or striking or eccentric, but rather they’re harried, harassed and distant;” The work contains a series of photographs of Manhattan and the people who inhabit that area of New York. For most of us we do not think of Manhattan as ‘like any other run down place’ we think of Manhattan as spectacular and exciting, evoking images of; the Empire State building, central park, the Brooklyn bridge etc Perhaps you need to look up most of the time to see Manhattan’s splendour.
The series I present here offers a point of view and comment on the effect our surroundings and environment have on us and how this can be related to the decisive moment; ‘The people are the same. They’re not glamorous or striking or eccentric, but rather they’re harried, harassed and distant’.
I read from this that Pantall means, the run down nature of the place in some way causes the people therein to be harried and harassed. I found this an interesting viewpoint and not one I fully agree with. I found this worthy of exploration for this assignment and how I could use my environment to explain why I disagree at least in part.
I live in the city of Edinburgh, Scotland which offers a very different experience and environment from Manhattan and I argue is in it’s own way compelling and interesting as well as spectacular and exciting. Looking up whilst traversing the streets of Edinburgh certainly provides for some fantastic sights as does looking up in Manhattan. Edinburgh differs though in that the wonderful architecture, statues, gardens etc are perhaps more accessible, closer and more connected with us. When walking around in the centre of Edinburgh it is actually quite impossible to avoid being surrounded by all of this splendour, it is there on every turn and in every street. I wonder also if the age of city adds something to the connection we have, which is not there in Graham’s Manhattan of 2012.
This leads me to consider that the message Paul Graham gives us in The Present, could not be shot in the centre of Edinburgh or at least would need to be drastically different in style and composition. In this series I investigate this idea. I do approached this with a preconceived viewpoint however, which is a challenge to The Present. Our environment, no matter how interesting compelling and engaging will fade from our consciousness after even a small amount of time. In this way the environment becomes meaningless to the message, The Present does not need a ‘run down place’ to support the message.
In conclusion; We are left with ‘They’re not glamorous or striking or eccentric, but rather they’re harried, harassed and distant’ and the moments are invariably indecisive, regardless of surroundings.
In the series, all shots have something of interest which could pull on the attention of the subjects the people in the photographs however they fail to grab that attention. The subjects are oblivious, they do not see what is right there and are left introverted and conscious only of themselves. Sometimes harried or harassed, possibly just relaxed but always distant and focussed inward. To express this idea I sometimes crop or set out of focus the thing of interest other times this is not necessary and the interest is right there yet still ignored. Around the subjects are buildings, statues, street performers and the castle itself.
With a mind to the photographic style of The Present;
- I have used a preset in Lightroom to evoke a rich analog film feel similar to the feel found in The Present.
- Some, although not all images are shot with subjects in middle distance.
- A number of the images are pairs where there is little difference between one shot and another.